Planning appeal decision
106 Ankerdine Crescent, Plumstead, London, SE18 3LG
Planning appeal 6000349 at 106 Ankerdine Crescent, Plumstead, London, SE18 3LG (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 3 November 2025 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development constitutes a separate dwelling from No 106, and if so, whether it provides satisfactory living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to internal space, private amenity space, sunlight, daylight, and outlook.
described on the application form as, “RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION FOR THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING OUTBUILDING TO GRANNY ANNEX
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- SE18 3LG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development constitutes a separate dwelling from No 106, and if so, whether it provides satisfactory living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to internal space, private amenity space, sunlight, daylight, and outlook
What decided it
The outbuilding provides all facilities for independent living and therefore constitutes a separate dwelling that fails to meet mandatory London Plan space standards and provides unacceptable living conditions, particularly poor bedroom outlook and insufficient private amenity space.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H5Policy D3Policy D6London Plan Table 3.1
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed30 September 2026600747044 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
- Dismissed14 July 20263375007Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
- Unknown14 July 20263374853Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
- Dismissed6 July 202633767672-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
- Allowed19 June 20266000585278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®