Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 November 20256000445

702 Woolwich Road, London, SE7 8LQ

Planning appeal 6000445 at 702 Woolwich Road, London, SE7 8LQ (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 11 November 2025 by Inspector Dring G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the availability of employment space within the area.

Change of use of two commercial units to two self-contained one-bedroom flats (Class E to Class C3)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Dring G
Postcode
SE7 8LQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the availability of employment space within the area
  • whether the development provides adequate living conditions for occupiers with particular regard to outdoor amenity space, outlook, privacy, daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The cumulative harm from loss of employment space and inadequate living conditions, particularly insufficient outdoor amenity space and compromised outlook and privacy, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits even under the tilted balance.

The limited social and economic benefits of two flats in an urban location with good services were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harms to employment space availability and living conditions, despite the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EA(a)Policy EA1Policy D6Policy H5Policy DH1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

216 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 May 20253357174
    Thames House, 7-9 Wellington Street, Woolwich, London, SE18 6PQ
  2. Dismissed25 November 20243342888
    Development Site at Former 54 Westcombe Hill , Blackheath, London, SE10 0LY
  3. Dismissed18 December 20233318029
    328 Woolwich Road, London, SE7 7AL
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  5. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.