Planning appeal decision
61A & 61B Eglinton Road, London, SE18 3SL
conversion of a single-family dwellinghouse into two self-contained flats in addition to the (proposed) construction of single storey rear extensions and roof terrace, three front rooflights, rear dormer and loft conversion, provision of cycle and refuse storage and all other associated works
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Reed J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed roof terrace on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area
What decided it
The harm caused to the character and appearance of the area by the proposed roof terrace, which would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing provision and economic benefits, even when assessed against the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The modest benefits of a minor increase in housing numbers and economic benefits were given significant weight in favour of the proposal, but the harm to character and appearance was given greater significant weight that outweighed these benefits, resulting in the proposal conflicting with the development plan with no other material considerations to outweigh this conflict.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), Policy H(c) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), Policy H5 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®