Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 March 20266000532

Land to the Rear of 3 to 7 Fishers Wood Grove, Bromley, BR2 8FD

Planning appeal 6000532 at Land to the Rear of 3 to 7 Fishers Wood Grove, Bromley, BR2 8FD (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 12 March 2026 by Inspector Cahalane R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, with particular reference to whether the appeal site is grey belt land in respect of its location within the Bromley, Hayes & Keston Commons Conservation Area and purposes (a), (b) and (d) in paragraph 143 of the NPPF.

erection of a residential development comprising 1no (minimum) and 9no (maximum) dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Cahalane R
Postcode
BR2 8FD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, with particular reference to whether the appeal site is grey belt land in respect of its location within the Bromley, Hayes & Keston Commons Conservation Area and purposes (a), (b) and (d) in paragraph 143 of the NPPF
  • If the appeal site is grey belt land, whether the proposal is inappropriate development for the purposes of the Framework and the development plan
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development of grey belt land, the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the landscape character of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the appeal scheme

What decided it

The proposal would not be in a sustainable location with particular reference to Framework paragraphs 110 and 115, as future residents would be heavily dependent on private vehicles due to the narrow, unlit access via Fishers Wood Grove lacking footways, making it inappropriate development of grey belt land that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

The significant weight afforded to housing delivery arising from the Council's 2.4-year housing land supply shortfall was outweighed by the substantial weight to be attached to harm to the Green Belt (inappropriate development and loss of openness) and the conflict with Framework policies directing development to sustainable locations, resulting in dismissal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 41Policy 33Policy 32Policy 4Policy 37Policy 77Policy 73Policy 49London Plan Policy DC3London Plan Policy HC1London Plan Policy T1London Plan Policy T4London Plan Policy T3London Plan Policy G2London Plan Policy D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 207Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

246 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Split Decision5 August 20263378375
    Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
  2. Planning permission granted17 June 20263351724
    Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd, 30 Station Road, Orpington, BR6 0SA
  3. Allowed28 May 20266007385
    223 Crofton Lane, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR6 0BL
  4. Dismissed19 May 20266001435
    Former Public Conveniences, 2 High Street, Green Street Green, Orpington, BR6 6BQ
  5. Dismissed12 May 20266002512
    54 Stanley Road, Bromley, BR2 9JH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.