Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 November 20256000573

Land at Millend Lane, Eastington, Gloucestershire, GL10 3SG

Planning appeal 6000573 at Land at Millend Lane, Eastington, Gloucestershire, GL10 3SG (Stroud District Council) was dismissed on 28 November 2025 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of self-build dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edwards J
Postcode
GL10 3SG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Stroud Industrial Heritage Conservation Area

What decided it

The public benefits of the proposal, including contribution to housing land supply and self-build provision, were insufficient to provide clear and convincing justification for the identified less than substantial harm to the character, appearance and significance of the conservation area and the intrinsic beauty of the countryside.

The significant weight given to the self-build housing contribution and moderate weight to general housing supply were outweighed by the great weight required to be given to conservation of the heritage asset and the harm to the character and appearance of the area and conservation area significance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP14ES10EP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stroud

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266005652
    Agricultural Barn, Upton Hill, Upton St Leonards, GL4 8DF
  2. Dismissed26 March 20266002277
    Land at Verney Road, Verney Road, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, GL10 2QD
  3. Dismissed24 February 20266001647
    Land at 86 Woodmancote, Dursley, Gloucestershire, GL11 4AJ
  4. Dismissed2 February 20266000860
    6 Velhurst Drive, Velhurst, Brownshill, Stroud, GL6 8AF
  5. Dismissed12 January 20266000893
    Land At Arthurs Yard, Tinkley Lane, Nympsfield, Gloucestershire, GL10 3UZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.