Planning appeal decision
Cliff Meadows, Tamworth Road, Kingsbury, B78 2DS
Planning appeal 6001004 at Cliff Meadows, Tamworth Road, Kingsbury, B78 2DS (North Warwickshire Borough Council) was allowed on 29 January 2026 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary with regard to: the effect of the development on openness and on the purposes of Green Belt policy.
change of use of land for a single pitch Gypsy residential site, installation of septic tank, creation of access, driveway, parking area and patio, construction of bunds and erection of gate without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref PAP/2023/0191 (APP/R3705/W/24/3338275), dated 26 July 2024
- Authority
- North Warwickshire Borough Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Unknown
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- B78 2DS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary with regard to: the effect of the development on openness and on the purposes of Green Belt policy
- the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the fear of crime
- if inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
Limiting the permission to a temporary period reduced the weight attributable to the Green Belt and character/appearance harms so that they were outweighed by the benefits, whereas on a permanent basis they were not.
the harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness, countryside encroachment and moderate harm to character and appearance was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits on a permanent basis, but when time-limited by a temporary permission the reduced weight of those harms was outweighed by the benefits to the family, amounting to very special circumstances
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP3Policy LP10Policy LP14Policy LP29(17)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 143
- Judgments
- Wheatcroft Ltd V SSE [1982]; Holborn Studios Ltd v CLBH [2017] EWHC 2823; West Midlands Probation Committee v SSE and Walsall MBC [1997] JPL 323
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Warwickshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed3 August 20266010427Land Opposite Quarry House, Nuneaton Road, Furnace End, Coleshill, B46 2NG
- Dismissed30 July 20266009798Land 120m North East of Ridley House, Ridley Lane, Nether Whitacre, B46 2DH
- Allowed22 June 20266004388Land Between 10 And 32, Birmingham Road, Whitacre Heath, B46 2EN
- Allowed11 December 20253349391Land 800 Metres South Of Park House Farm, Meriden Road, Fillongley, Warwickshire, CV7 8BP
- Dismissed2 September 20253364043Brook Farm Cottage, Atherstone Road, Over Whitacre, Warwickshire, B46 2LP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®