Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 March 20266001207

2 Rookery Lane, Wolverhampton, WV2 4PU

Planning appeal 6001207 at 2 Rookery Lane, Wolverhampton, WV2 4PU (Wolverhampton City Council) was dismissed on 3 March 2026 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the appeal property.

a loft conversion with dormers an existing hip roof changed to gables and single storey kitchen and utility extension, boundary treatment with brick pier and infill timber panels, railing and wall and gates along Tudor Crescent

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
WV2 4PU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the appeal property
  • the living conditions of occupiers of 4 Rookery Lane, in terms of outlook, light and privacy
  • highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would be harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, would adversely affect the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in terms of outlook and light, and would create highway safety risks, with no material considerations outweighing the conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP4Policy ENV3Policy D3Policy D4Policy D5Policy D6Policy D7Policy D8Policy D9Policy AM15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

67 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wolverhampton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266009135
    6 and 6a Fairview Road,, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton, WV11 1BY
  2. Planning permission granted4 September 20263364454
    1D Clark Road, Wolverhampton, WV3 9NW
  3. Allowed14 April 20266001520
    Warehouse Between 4 and 6 Fawdry Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 4PA
  4. Dismissed25 March 20266002183
    232 Willenhall Road, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV1 2JQ
  5. Dismissed23 December 20256000997
    14 Wincote Drive, Tettenhall, Wolverhampton, WV6 8LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.