Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 May 20266001362

36 Mount Ephraim Lane, Lambeth, London, SW16 1JD

Planning appeal 6001362 at 36 Mount Ephraim Lane, Lambeth, London, SW16 1JD (London Borough of Lambeth) was allowed on 14 May 2026 by Inspector Kirkaldy J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on housing supply in the borough.

amalgamation of the 3no. existing flats (Class C3) into a single dwellinghouse (Class C3)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kirkaldy J
Postcode
SW16 1JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on housing supply in the borough

What decided it

The proposal would not result in a discernible reduction in residential density or housing supply, and accords with the development plan's objectives of increasing housing supply and securing a mix of housing to meet identified need.

The presumption in favour of sustainable development arising from the Housing Delivery Test shortfall was balanced against the proposal's accordance with the development plan and its contribution to family housing provision, with the balance tipping in favour of allowing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021)Policy H8 of the London Plan (2021)Policy H1 of the London Plan (2021)Policy H2 of the London Plan (2021)Policy H10(9) of the London Plan (2021)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8
Judgments
London Borough of Lambeth Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (2024) EWHC 1391 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

477 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266013497
    48 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0JQ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266015494
    16 Lydon Road, London, SW4 0HW
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266015253
    16 Braxted Park, London, SW16 3DW
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266014222
    Morleys Department Store, 472 - 488 Brixton Road, London, SW9 8EH
  5. Dismissed20 October 20266014083
    Bus Shelter, Pavement Outside 451-453 Brixton Road, London, SE9 8HH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.