Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 April 20266001500

Land At 22 And To Rear Of 18 To 28 Fairview Avenue, Stanford Le Hope, Essex, SS17 0DW

Planning appeal 6001500 at Land At 22 And To Rear Of 18 To 28 Fairview Avenue, Stanford Le Hope, Essex, SS17 0DW (Thurrock Borough Council) was allowed on 16 April 2026 by Inspector Courtney T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, outlook, noise and disturbance.

a residential development comprising eight units (all matters reserved except layout and access)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Courtney T
Postcode
SS17 0DW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, outlook, noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to the proposed access
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate parking
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site

What decided it

The acute shortage of housing land supply (1.02 years) and the application of the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d) meant that the limited harm to neighbouring amenity was outweighed by the significant benefits of delivering eight new dwellings in a sustainable location.

The limited harm to neighbouring living conditions (outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance) was outweighed by the significant benefits of providing eight new dwellings to address the Council's severe housing land supply shortfall, the effective use of land within the urban area, and compliance with NPPF paragraph 73 on small and medium sites, together with acceptable highway safety, parking and protected site mitigation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PMD1Policy PMD2Policy PMD7Policy PMD8Policy PMD9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Thurrock

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266009919
    Land Rear of Ewen House, High Road, Fobbing, SS17 9JH
  2. Dismissed23 September 20266010223
    70 London Road,, Thurrock, Grays, RM17 5YB
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008878
    9 Lyndhurst Road, Corringham, SS17 7SJ
  4. Allowed27 July 20266010667
    Willow Cottage, Windsor Avenue, Grays, RM16 2UB
  5. Dismissed24 July 20266007409
    Land To Rear Of 36 To 54 Grovelands Way, Grays, RM17 5YG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.