Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 March 20266001691

34a Netherhall Gardens, London, NW3 5TP

demolition of existing dwellinghouse and erection of three storey replacement house, including excavation of basement. Associated works including replacement of front boundary wall and erection of cycle and waste storage

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether sufficient evidence has been provided to justify the demolition of the existing building, having regard to climate change and waste reduction objectives
  • Whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that retention and improvement of the existing building was not possible as required by Policy CC1 criterion e, and the proposed replacement would cause considerable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area that was not outweighed by the limited public benefits identified.

Framework references: 58, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy SI 7, Policy D1, Policy D2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.