Planning appeal decision
Barn at Stokes Hall, Burnham Road, Althorne, Essex, CM3 6DS
Planning appeal 6001732 at Barn at Stokes Hall, Burnham Road, Althorne, Essex, CM3 6DS (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 5 February 2026 by Inspector Dade E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy.
conversion of the barn to one residential dwelling (Use Class C3), new access road, associated parking, landscaping and servicing
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dade E
- Postcode
- CM3 6DS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy
- The effect of the proposed development on living conditions, with particular regard to privacy
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species
- The effect of the proposed development on European sites
- Whether other considerations outweigh any harm identified such as to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal's location outside any settlement boundary, requiring dependence on private vehicles for access to services and facilities, combined with significant overlooking harm to neighbouring living conditions, would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery and efficient use of land under the tilted balance.
The adverse impacts from the unsustainable location conflicting with Framework paragraph 115 and the significant harm to living conditions from overlooking were afforded significant weight against the proposal; these significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate positive weight given to the provision of one dwelling, efficient use of land, and environmental benefits including biodiversity net gain, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S8Policy S1Policy T2Policy D1Policy D2Policy T1Policy N2Policy N1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 20266011264Rosary, Grange Road, Tillingham, CM0 7UR
- Dismissed16 October 20266009926Agricultural Building At Wraywick Farm, The Marshes, Southminster, CM0 7JN
- Dismissed14 October 20266009639Land Adjacent Howells Farm Cottages, Maypole Road, Great Totham, CM9 4SY
- Allowed16 September 2026601290643 Main Road, St Lawrence, Chelmsford, CM0 7LY
- Allowed18 August 20266005664Land West of Spratts Farm, Queenborough Road, Southminster, CM0 7AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®