Planning appeal decision
Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW
Planning appeal 6001763 at Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW (Wychavon District Council) was allowed on 23 March 2026 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), taking into account the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
construction of a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 dwellings
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cuthbert L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), taking into account the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- whether the proposal would provide an appropriate level of affordable housing
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to the development strategy for the area and accessibility to services and facilities
- if the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply (1.1 years) engaged the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework, which required permission to be granted unless adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed benefits, and the Inspector found they did not.
The conflict with the development strategy and accessibility limitations (moderate weight harm) were outweighed by the significant weight afforded to housing delivery benefits and the moderate weight of socio-economic and economic benefits, in the context of the severe housing land supply shortfall and the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SWDP 2Policy SWDP 13Policy SWDP 16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 11Paragraph 61
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 September 20266009011The Geldings, Bouts Lane, Holberrow Green, Inkberrow, Redditch, B96 6JX
- Dismissed17 September 20266008404Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
- Invalid3 August 20266006351Lincomb Farm, Lincomb Lane, Hertlebury, DY13 9RB
- Allowed23 June 20263373051Land at (Os 9463 5414), Naunton Road, Naunton Beauchamp, Upton Snodsbur, WR7 4NZ
- Allowed9 June 20266004777Land Rear of Tudor Cottage and Including Part of, Blackberry Barn, Manor Lane, Bredons Norton, GL20 7HB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®