Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20266001934

335 Euston Road, Camden, London, NW1 3AD

Planning appeal 6001934 at 335 Euston Road, Camden, London, NW1 3AD (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 5 March 2026 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the obligations necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms would be secured.

demolition of existing single-storey commercial building (Class E); erection of three-storey building with basement for the provision of a medical centre (Class E), without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2024/3497/P, dated 22 August 2025

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
NW1 3AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the obligations necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms would be secured
  • the effect of varying the condition on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring buildings, with particular regard to the effect of the first-floor massing of the proposed development on the outlook and sense of enclosure for the occupiers of No 54 Warren Street

What decided it

The failure to secure the planning obligations necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms, as the original Section 106 agreement was expressly tied to the original permission and contained no provision for its obligations to apply to a new permission granted under Section 73.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy A1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 58

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 842 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.