Planning appeal decision
Southview, Abbey View Road, Medstead, GU34 5BP
Planning appeal 6002082 at Southview, Abbey View Road, Medstead, GU34 5BP (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 1 May 2026 by Inspector Nicholls H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.
permission in principle for 9 dwellings, following demolition of existing dwellings, stables and barns and removal of caravan
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- GU34 5BP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development
What decided it
The totality of harms from unsustainable location and character change do not outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, and the development conflicts with the development plan.
The benefits of nine dwellings and affordable housing, attributed great weight, were outweighed by significant harm from reliance on private vehicles due to peripheral location and demonstrable harm to rural character and openness, such that the Framework did not indicate a decision other than in accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP10Policy CP2Policy CP19Policy CP31Policy CP13Policy CP28Policy CP29Policy 1 of the Medstead and Four Marks Neighbourhood PlanPolicy H14 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review (2006)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 2026601335385 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
- Allowed29 October 202660133689 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
- Allowed28 October 20266012533362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
- Dismissed27 October 20266011297Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
- Allowed12 October 20266006152Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®