Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 May 20266002082

Southview, Abbey View Road, Medstead, GU34 5BP

Planning appeal 6002082 at Southview, Abbey View Road, Medstead, GU34 5BP (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 1 May 2026 by Inspector Nicholls H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.

permission in principle for 9 dwellings, following demolition of existing dwellings, stables and barns and removal of caravan

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Nicholls H
Postcode
GU34 5BP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The totality of harms from unsustainable location and character change do not outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, and the development conflicts with the development plan.

The benefits of nine dwellings and affordable housing, attributed great weight, were outweighed by significant harm from reliance on private vehicles due to peripheral location and demonstrable harm to rural character and openness, such that the Framework did not indicate a decision other than in accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP10Policy CP2Policy CP19Policy CP31Policy CP13Policy CP28Policy CP29Policy 1 of the Medstead and Four Marks Neighbourhood PlanPolicy H14 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review (2006)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hampshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013353
    85 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
  2. Allowed29 October 20266013368
    9 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
  3. Allowed28 October 20266012533
    362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011297
    Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266006152
    Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.