Planning appeal decision
Hilltop Country House, Flash Lane, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4ED
residential development
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location and the proposed land use
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing land, combined with the site comprising grey belt land under Framework paragraph 155 where development would not fundamentally undermine remaining Green Belt purposes and the location is sustainable for a rural area, outweighed the conflict with the development plan.
the demonstrable unmet housing need and the site's status as grey belt land suitable for residential development in a sustainable rural location outweighed the conflict with the development plan policies
Framework references: 155, 143, 110, 115
Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy PG10, Policy MP1, Policy SD1, Policy SD2
Judgments cited: Julian Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin); Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R(on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®