Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 April 20266002211

Hilltop Country House, Flash Lane, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4ED

residential development

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location and the proposed land use

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing land, combined with the site comprising grey belt land under Framework paragraph 155 where development would not fundamentally undermine remaining Green Belt purposes and the location is sustainable for a rural area, outweighed the conflict with the development plan.

the demonstrable unmet housing need and the site's status as grey belt land suitable for residential development in a sustainable rural location outweighed the conflict with the development plan policies

Framework references: 155, 143, 110, 115

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy PG10, Policy MP1, Policy SD1, Policy SD2

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin); Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R(on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.