Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 July 20266002300

Hamilton House, Larch Avenue, Ascot, SL5 0AP

the Conversion and extension of the existing building to form 4 flats

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SL5 0AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on climate change
  • the effect of the development on the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (the SPA)

What decided it

The failure to secure a signed planning obligation providing SAMM and SANG mitigation measures meant that a likely adverse effect on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA could not be ruled out, requiring refusal under the Habitat Regulations.

The modest housing benefits and efficient use of previously developed land were outweighed by the inability to rule out adverse effects on the SPA and the failure to secure carbon net-zero mitigation, with habitat site protection providing a strong reason for refusal that displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

Framework references: 57, 11

Plan policies cited: SP2, QP1, QP3, NR4

Judgments cited: Westminster City Council v Gems House Residences Chiltern Street Ltd [2025] EWHC 1789

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.