Planning appeal decision
25 Wote Street, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7NE
Planning appeal 6002470 at 25 Wote Street, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7NE (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 April 2026 by Inspector Lawrence E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the Basingstoke Town Conservation Area (BTCA) and the setting to Haymarket Theatre and 12 Wote Street which are both Grade II listed.
removal of hard standing and clearance of site and the erection of a block of 6 apartments, including amenity space, landscape treatment, cycle parking and other associated infrastructure
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lawrence E
- Postcode
- RG21 7NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the Basingstoke Town Conservation Area (BTCA) and the setting to Haymarket Theatre and 12 Wote Street which are both Grade II listed
- Whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for the occupiers of proposed flats 1 & 2 with regard to outlook, privacy and light
- Whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for the occupiers of all of the proposed flats with regard to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Basingstoke Town Conservation Area, combined with unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers due to outlook, privacy, daylight and noise impacts, could not be outweighed by the modest housing contribution and economic benefits, particularly given the heritage protection policies engaged by paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework.
The substantial weight given to harm to the conservation area character and appearance and to poor living conditions for occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate weight given to housing supply contribution and town centre location benefits, and the small weight given to long-term economic benefits, such that the adverse impacts outweighed the public benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- EM10EM11EM12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 75Paragraph 90Paragraph 115Paragraph 128Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 198Paragraph 200Paragraph 212Paragraph 214
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
- Allowed26 May 20263375485Land North Of Whitchurch Station, Whitchurch, RG28 7ED
- Dismissed15 December 20253373264Tadley Tandoori, 1 Mount Pleasant, Tadley, RG26 4JH
- Dismissed19 November 20253367794The Olive House Restaurant, 21 Church Street, Basingstoke, RG21 7QQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®