Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 May 20266002631

100 Central Avenue, Hounslow, TW3 2QL

Planning appeal 6002631 at 100 Central Avenue, Hounslow, TW3 2QL (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 5 May 2026 by Inspector Glasin J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed 9 person HMO (Use Class Sui Generis) would be appropriately located, with particular regard to access to local services and public transport provision.

Alteration from existing HMO (Use Class C4) to Large HMO (Use Class Sui Generis) for 9 occupants including a single storey rear infill

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Glasin J
Postcode
TW3 2QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed 9 person HMO (Use Class Sui Generis) would be appropriately located, with particular regard to access to local services and public transport provision
  • Whether the proposal provides acceptable living conditions for existing and future occupiers, with particular regard to internal space
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • Whether the proposal provides adequate car parking provision and the effect on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would conflict with the development plan on multiple grounds: inappropriate location for HMO use, inadequate internal space standards for the increased occupancy, unacceptable noise and disturbance to neighbours, and unresolved parking and highway safety concerns.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SC10Policy SC5Policy EC2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

577 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011171
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266007899
    92 Windmill Road, Brentford, TW8 9NA
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010652
    14 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266006466
    88A Crispen Road, Feltham, TW13 6QR
  5. Allowed13 July 20266006483
    Units 4 and 10 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.