Planning appeal decision
Dalham Barn, Cooling Road, High Halstow, Kent, ME3 8SE
Planning appeal 6002778 at Dalham Barn, Cooling Road, High Halstow, Kent, ME3 8SE (Medway Council) was dismissed on 1 April 2026 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed dwelling having regard to the Council's strategy for the location of development and access to services and facilities.
retrospective application for a self-build dwelling following the approval of a Class Q application (with reference MC/23/2723)
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- ME3 8SE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed dwelling having regard to the Council's strategy for the location of development and access to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on ecology
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the countryside
What decided it
The insufficient information regarding the presence of protected species (great crested newts) and the lack of adequate mitigation, combined with the conflict with the development plan's locational strategy, meant that the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole under the tilted balance.
The benefits of delivering one new dwelling, self-build provision, economic benefits, energy efficiency features and re-use of barn materials were outweighed by the significant harm to protected species that could not be adequately mitigated and the conflict with the development plan's locational strategy, even accounting for the mitigating factor of the existing Class Q prior approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy BNE25Policy BNE37Policy BNE1Policy H004Policy H006
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 193Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Medway
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed2 October 20266009769Street Record, Callis Way, Parkwood, Gillingham, ME8 9PA
- Dismissed21 September 20266004691Land South of Woodview House, Perry Hill, Cliffe Woods, ME3 7TX
- Dismissed21 October 2024333834934 Thorndale Close, Chatham, ME5 9SW
- Dismissed1 March 20243325107Land off Lodge Hill Lane, Chattenden, ME3 8NY
- Dismissed29 February 20243323010Land on West Side of Newlands Farm Road, St Marys Hoo, Rochester, Kent, ME3 8QT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®