Planning appeal decision
163 Gunnersbury Lane, Ealing, Acton, W3 8LJ
demolition of existing semi-detached houses. Construction of a new building comprising seven new flats. Excavation for basement accommodation, provision for cycle and refuse storage
- Authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- W3 8LJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Gunnersbury Conservation Area
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to daylight and sunlight, outlook and the provision of private amenity space
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, having particular regard to noise and privacy
- Whether the proposal would promote sustainable transport options
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for waste and recycling facilities
- Whether the proposal provides adequate provision for renewable energy and low carbon technologies
What decided it
The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, and the public benefits of housing delivery did not outweigh this harm given the Council's demonstrated five-year housing land supply.
The public benefits of the proposal, including housing supply and mix in an accessible location, did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, particularly as the Council can deliver a five-year supply of housing land and great weight must be given to heritage asset conservation.
Framework references: 215
Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy CC4, Policy SC5, Policy SC7, Policy EC2, Policy EQ1, Policy EQ2, Policy EQ7, Policy HC1, Policy D6, Policy SI 2, Policy T6
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®