Planning appeal decision
50, Abercorn Gardens, London, RM6 4SX
Planning appeal 6002822 at 50, Abercorn Gardens, London, RM6 4SX (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 20 April 2026 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 52 Abercorn Gardens, with particular reference to outlook and light.
6m single storey rear extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Redbridge
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- RM6 4SX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 52 Abercorn Gardens, with particular reference to outlook and light
What decided it
The proposal would result in unacceptable harm to the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers at 52 Abercorn Gardens through an enclosing effect and material reduction in daylight and sunlight.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
- Allowed25 September 20266013032289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
- Dismissed25 September 202633619992A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
- Allowed25 September 2026336022938, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
- Notice varied and upheld23 September 2026336944412 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®