Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20266002841

39 Gresford Avenue, Liverpool, L17 2AN

Planning appeal 6002841 at 39 Gresford Avenue, Liverpool, L17 2AN (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 3 July 2026 by Inspector C Evans, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the dormer on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, including on Toxteth Park and Avenues CA.

retrospective change of use for a 7-bed HMO with associated changes (rear dormer extension)

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
C Evans
Postcode
L17 2AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the dormer on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, including on Toxteth Park and Avenues CA
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether the development provides acceptable living conditions for current and future occupiers of the property, with particular regard to outlook, provision of internal space and outdoor amenity space
  • the effect of the development on the mix and balance of housing in the area
  • whether the development provides appropriate waste and recycling facilities

What decided it

The dormer and roof light cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character by disrupting the unbroken roofline that is a defining characteristic of the area, and this harm is not outweighed by the public benefits of the HMO use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
H7H8H10H11HD1UD1UD2UD7WM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

242 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Liverpool City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010099
    33 Liscard Road, Liverpool, L15 0HH
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266008534
    356 Prescot Road, Liverpool, L13 3AP
  3. Allowed17 August 20266010623
    197 Alderson Road, Liverpool, L15 1HQ
  4. Dismissed17 August 20266009126
    6 Grenadier Drive, Liverpool, L12 4ZN
  5. Dismissed23 June 20266006568
    122 Lawrence Road, Liverpool, L15 0EQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.