Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20266002887

Outside Visram House, Acton Lane, London, NW10 7UF

Planning appeal 6002887 at Outside Visram House, Acton Lane, London, NW10 7UF (Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation) was dismissed on 8 May 2026 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposed development would prejudice future highway and public realm improvements; and the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the deployment of a Street Hub 3 Unit

Authority
Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
NW10 7UF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the proposed development would prejudice future highway and public realm improvements; and the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on the visual amenity of the area.

What decided it

The proposed Street Hub's location would prejudice future highway and public realm improvements at the Big X junction required by the development plan, and this conflict could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal or the possibility of relocation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P6Policy SP10Policy EU11Policy D1Policy D8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

443 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266013036
    60 Newark Crescent, Ealing, Park Royal, NW10 7BA
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266013035
    50 Newark Crescent, Ealing, Park Royal, NW10 7BA
  3. Dismissed9 June 20266005485
    36-38 Chase Road, Park Royal, NW10 6QN
  4. Allowed8 May 20263376962
    Outside Visram House, Acton Lane, London, NW10 7UF
  5. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20253354820
    Centre House St. Leonards Road, London, NW10 6ST

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.