Planning appeal decision
Land at Tongham Services, A31 / A331, Tongham, GU10 1FP
Planning appeal 6002913 at Land at Tongham Services, A31 / A331, Tongham, GU10 1FP (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 May 2026 by Inspector Rawle S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would represent an appropriate location within the countryside with particular regard to the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and whether or not it would lead to a greater physical or visual coalescence between the Ash and Tongham urban area and Aldershot.
the erection of a freestanding McDonald's Restaurant with drive thru facility, car parking, landscaping and associated works, including Customer Order Displays (COD) and a play frame
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Major retail and services
- Inspector
- Rawle S
- Postcode
- GU10 1FP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would represent an appropriate location within the countryside with particular regard to the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and whether or not it would lead to a greater physical or visual coalescence between the Ash and Tongham urban area and Aldershot
- Whether or not sufficient information has been provided to assess the impact of the proposed development on protected species and habitats and whether or not the proposal would unacceptably harm the Tongham Pond and Tice's Meadow Site of Nature Conservation Importance or be at odds with the objectives of the Blackwater River Biodiversity Opportunity Area
What decided it
The proposal's unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the countryside and the resulting greater physical coalescence between the Ash and Tongham urban area and Aldershot, to which substantial weight was given.
The moderate weight afforded to the totality of the scheme's benefits was outweighed by the substantial weight given to the harm to character, appearance and coalescence, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P3 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan: strategy and sites 2015-2034Policy ID4 of the GBLPSSPolicy 10 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan Development Management PoliciesPolicy P6 of the GBLPDMPPolicy P7 of the GBLPDMP
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed20 October 20266013901Anchor House, Station Row, Shalford, GU4 8BY
- Dismissed19 October 2026601400132 Fairborne Way, Guildford, gu29gb
- decided16 October 202660107129 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
- Allowed15 October 20266009940Store Rear of 4 Station Parade, Ockham Road South, East Horsley, KT24 6QN
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®