Planning appeal decision
Land East Of 21 The Marshes Lane, Mere Brow, PR4 6JR
Planning appeal 6002977 at Land East Of 21 The Marshes Lane, Mere Brow, PR4 6JR (West Lancashire District Council) was dismissed on 31 March 2026 by Inspector Clark J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Permission in Principle application for a minimum of 4 dwellings and a maximum of 9 dwellings
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Clark J
- Postcode
- PR4 6JR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of flooding at the site or in the vicinity of it
- the effect on the provision of agricultural land in the area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The site cannot be classified as grey belt because part of it is in Flood Zone 2 and the physical presence of a substantial ditch indicates potential flooding, which provides a strong reason for refusing development under footnote 7 of the Framework, making the proposal inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by the modest housing contribution.
the substantial weight afforded to harm by reason of inappropriateness and the potential risk of flooding outweighed the modest but worthwhile contribution to housing land supply, such that very special circumstances do not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GN1Policy GN3Policy EN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 143Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 170
- Judgments
- Wrotham Parish Council v SoS and Moto Hospitality Ltd and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2026] EWHC 165 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lancashire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed13 October 202660137566 Moss Lane, Bickerstaffe, L39 0EX
- Allowed5 October 20266010014Land at Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall, West Lancs, L39 8SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266007428Land Adjacent to Model Farm, Plex Lane, Halsall, Ormskirk, L39 7JY
- Dismissed15 September 202660121883 Broad Lane, Downholland, Ormskirk, L39 7HS
- Allowed14 September 20266007163Prince Williams Inn, Beacon Lane, Dalton, WN8 7RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®