Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266003136

52 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ

sub-divide the site to two plots to include one 2-bed house and one self-contained studio flat

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the supply of family housing in the Borough
  • whether suitable living conditions would be provided for future occupants of the proposed development, with regard to the provision of internal and external amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed on the integrity of the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (EFSAC)
  • whether the proposal would encourage sustainable modes of transport and the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with regard to car parking and pedestrian safety
  • whether the suitable cycle parking facilities would be provided for future occupants of the proposed development

What decided it

The proposal's conflicts with the development plan regarding loss of family housing, inadequate internal space standards, failure to secure EFSAC mitigation, and non-compliance with sustainable transport policies collectively outweighed the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling.

Plan policies cited: Policy 20, Policy 15, Policy 56, Policy D6, Policy 81, Policy 60, Policy 66, Policy 61

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.