Planning appeal decision
White Roses, Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF
Planning appeal 6003202 at White Roses, Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 17 June 2026 by Inspector P B Jarvis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
Replacement front canopy, single storey rear/side extension with sedum roof, new sedum roof to existing rear extension, raised rear patio and alterations to fenestration
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- P B Jarvis
- Postcode
- SL6 2PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on Green Belt openness
- The effect of the proposal on the setting of the adjoining Grade II listed building, Old Lodge Farm
- Whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to satisfy the exception in Framework paragraph 154(c) for extensions that do not result in disproportionate additions, as the cumulative effect of the proposed extensions and roofs would be disproportionate to the original dwelling, and no very special circumstances exist to justify the resulting inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 153
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
- Dismissed27 July 20266008948Land To The North of Stubbings Farm Cottages, Burchetts Green Road Burchetts Green, Windsor And Maidenhead, Maidenhead, SL6 6QT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®