Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20266003202

White Roses, Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF

Planning appeal 6003202 at White Roses, Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 17 June 2026 by Inspector P B Jarvis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

Replacement front canopy, single storey rear/side extension with sedum roof, new sedum roof to existing rear extension, raised rear patio and alterations to fenestration

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
P B Jarvis
Postcode
SL6 2PF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on Green Belt openness
  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of the adjoining Grade II listed building, Old Lodge Farm
  • Whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to satisfy the exception in Framework paragraph 154(c) for extensions that do not result in disproportionate additions, as the cumulative effect of the proposed extensions and roofs would be disproportionate to the original dwelling, and no very special circumstances exist to justify the resulting inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QP5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 153

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

65 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266009260
    2 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
  4. Notice upheld10 August 20263369085
    Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
  5. Dismissed27 July 20266008948
    Land To The North of Stubbings Farm Cottages, Burchetts Green Road Burchetts Green, Windsor And Maidenhead, Maidenhead, SL6 6QT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.