Planning appeal decision
Chestnut Lodge, Smithy Green Lower Peover, Knutsford, WA16 9PW
Planning appeal 6003518 at Chestnut Lodge, Smithy Green Lower Peover, Knutsford, WA16 9PW (Cheshire East Council) was dismissed on 1 June 2026 by Inspector Kate Williams, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework.
a 2 storey self-build home with 5 bedrooms and garage
- Authority
- Cheshire East Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Kate Williams
- Postcode
- WA16 9PW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the proposal would have a harmful effect on European Protected Species
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to satisfy the transport and accessibility requirements of Framework paragraphs 110 and 115 necessary to qualify for the grey belt exception, and the absence of up-to-date ecological surveys creates fundamental uncertainty regarding harm to European Protected Species, together with the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, which cannot be clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of a single self-build dwelling.
The modest benefits of providing a single self-build plot and limited contribution to housing supply were substantially outweighed by the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the loss of openness, the unsustainable location creating reliance on private car use, and the unresolved uncertainty regarding European Protected Species.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy SE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 192Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed13 October 20266009638The Smithy, Adlington Road, Wilmslow, SK9 2LN
- Dismissed8 October 202660108534 St Peters Avenue, Knutsford, WA16 0DN
- Allowed5 October 20266008576Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
- Allowed2 October 20266010578Land at Dunvilles Farm, Bollington Lane, Chelford Road, Monks Heath, Macclesfield, SK10 4UL
- Dismissed30 September 20266010213Disley Meadow, Lower Greenshall Lane, Disley, SK12 2HH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®