Planning appeal decision
Land South of White Post Lane, Cobham, Gravesend, DA13 9AX
Planning appeal 6003544 at Land South of White Post Lane, Cobham, Gravesend, DA13 9AX (Gravesham) was dismissed on 10 June 2026 by Inspector J Bowyer, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
change of use of the land for the stationing of 8 mobile homes for gypsy and traveller use, erection of associated day rooms, soft landscaping and laying of hardstanding
- Authority
- Gravesham
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy
- Inspector
- J Bowyer
- Postcode
- DA13 9AX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the landscape character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to occupiers' access to services, facilities and sustainable transport modes
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- the effect of the proposal on European designated and Ramsar sites
- if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The significant and unacceptable harm to highway safety arising from inadequate visibility at the site access was found to be an overriding factor that could not be outweighed by the benefits of the scheme.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with substantial harm to highway safety and lesser harm to landscape character and location sustainability, clearly outweighed the significant benefits of meeting unmet Gypsy and Traveller accommodation needs and the substantial weight given to the best interests of the children, so very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS02Policy CS11Policy CS12Policy CS17Policy CS19Policy T1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Gravesham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed15 October 20266007106Blackthorn Farm, Wrotham Road, Culverstone Green, Meopham, Gravesend, DA13 0QW
- Dismissed1 September 202660056037 Hornfield Cottages, David Street, Meopham, Gravesend, DA13 0BU
- Allowed20 August 20263361359Parsonage Farm, The Street, Cobham, Kent, DA12 3DG
- Notice varied and upheld18 August 20263352876Land to the West of Sole Street Station (Known As Norbond Site), Sole Street, Cobham, Gravesend, Kent, DA13 0XY
- Allowed22 July 20266008224Walnut Hill Nursery, Walnut Hill Road, Istead Rise, DA13 9HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®