Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 April 20266003554

32 Snaithing Park Road, Sheffield, S10 3LJ

Planning appeal 6003554 at 32 Snaithing Park Road, Sheffield, S10 3LJ (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 10 April 2026 by Inspector Hatch P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the host building and the character of the area, giving special regard to the effect on the Ranmoor Conservation Area.

the 1st floor extension with pitched roof above previous ground floor flat-roofed extension, with alterations to existing windows / doors

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hatch P
Postcode
S10 3LJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the host building and the character of the area, giving special regard to the effect on the Ranmoor Conservation Area

What decided it

The scale and massing of the proposed extension would cause harm to the character and appearance of the host building and the significance of the Ranmoor Conservation Area that is not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS74 of the Sheffield Core StrategyPolicy H14 of the Sheffield Unitary Development PlanPolicy BE5 of the Sheffield Unitary Development PlanPolicy BE15 of the Sheffield Unitary Development PlanPolicy BE16 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

75 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014327
    4 Struan Road, Sheffield, S7 2EH
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014347
    Advertising Right Adjacent Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
  4. Allowed16 October 20266014719
    1 Twickenham Court, Halfway, Sheffield, S20 4HT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266012829
    189 Crimicar Lane, Sheffield, S10 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.