Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 May 20266003561

170-172 Harlesden High Street, London, London, Greater London, NW10 4ST

the demolition of rear extension and erection of two front bay windows, 2x single-storey rear extensions, basement extension, change of use of the front ground floor premises and basement from retail (Use class A1) and existing flat on rear ground floor (Use Cl ass C3) to wholly residential (Use class C3), use as 3x self-contained flats, boundary treatment, rear garden terraces, refuse and cycle storage

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hunter A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether future occupiers would have satisfactory living conditions, with particular regard to outlook, layout, sunlight and private amenity space provision

What decided it

The poor and inadequate outlook from habitable rooms, particularly the basement bedrooms facing narrow lightwells and the ground floor rooms relying on a constrained sunroom, would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of future occupiers that could not be justified by other policy benefits or the development's contribution to housing supply.

Framework references: 11, 135

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D6, Brent Local Plan Policy BH13, Brent Local Plan Policy DMP1, Brent Residential Amenity Space & Place Quality SPD, Brent Design Guide SPD1, Brent Basement Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.