Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 May 20266003920

Cope Cottage, 6 Hortham Lane, Almondsbury, BS32 4JH

Erection of side porch. Erection of a first floor and single storey rear extension. Demolition of 3no. outbuildings and erection of 1no. detached garage

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clifford E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriate development, combined with modest harm to openness, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist to justify the proposal.

Framework references: 154, 142, 55

Plan policies cited: Policy CS5, Policy PSP7, Policy CS1, Policy PSP38

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.