Pavement Opposite 36-42 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1M 5PS

Planning appeal 6004034 at Pavement Opposite 36-42 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1M 5PS (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 24 June 2026 by Inspector F P Tinsley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Charterhouse Square, Clerkenwell Green, and Hat and Feathers Conservation Areas, as well as on the setting of nearby listed buildings.

Installation of a multifunctional communication hub including defibrillator and advertisement display

Authority: London Borough of Islington
Appeal type: Planning
Procedure: Written
Development: utilities-energy
Inspector: F P Tinsley
Postcode: EC1M 5PS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Charterhouse Square, Clerkenwell Green, and Hat and Feathers Conservation Areas, as well as on the setting of nearby listed buildings
the effect of the proposed development on trees
the effect of the proposed advertisement on visual amenity

What decided it

The visual harm to the character and appearance of the area and the setting of nearby listed buildings and conservation areas, combined with insufficient information to protect nearby trees, outweighed the moderate public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy D3Policy D4Policy PLAN1Policy DH1Policy DH2Policy DH6Policy ST3Policy AAP8Policy G4Policy G1Policy T2
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 820 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Allowed22 October 20266006605
131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
Allowed16 October 20266005930
30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
Allowed24 September 20266005904
Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
Dismissed24 September 20266005590
2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.