Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20266004122

68 Jacksons Edge Road, Disley, disley, Cheshire, SK12 2JR

a “retrospective application for retention of boundary fencing, sliding access gate and raising height of stone pillars

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Manson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the fencing and gates are inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the fencing and gates on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the fencing and gates on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether, if the fence and gates are inappropriate development, the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that results in substantial harm to openness and character, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify it.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy PG 3 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy 2010-2030, Policy RUR 11 of the Cheshire East Local Plan, Site Allocations and Development Policies Document, Policy GEN1 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Site Allocations and Development Policies Document 2022, Policy HOU11 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Site Allocations and Development Policies Document 2022, Policy SE1 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy 2010-2030

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.