Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20266004158

1 National Terrace, Bermondsey Wall East, London, SE16 4TZ

Planning appeal 6004158 at 1 National Terrace, Bermondsey Wall East, London, SE16 4TZ (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 23 June 2026 by Inspector S F Barnes, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on flood risk, with particular regard to long-term maintenance of the Thames Tidal Flood Defence.

rear extension beneath the existing rear first floor balcony plus a 2 storey side extension providing a room on the ground floor and another on the first floor, similar in form to a conservatory

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
S F Barnes
Postcode
SE16 4TZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on flood risk, with particular regard to long-term maintenance of the Thames Tidal Flood Defence
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, Corbett's Wharf, 87 Bermondsey Wall East, and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edward III's Rotherhithe Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would prejudice the ability to effectively access, maintain and upgrade the Thames Tidal Flood Defence in conflict with Policy P68 of The Southwark Plan, and the suggested conditions could not overcome this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P68Policy SI12Policy P13Policy P19Policy P20Policy P21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

373 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed20 October 20266010489
    269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266001859
    5 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266003226
    Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266012237
    123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266007608
    134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.