Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20266004215

6 Marsh Lane, Oxford, OX3 0NF

Planning appeal 6004215 at 6 Marsh Lane, Oxford, OX3 0NF (Oxford City Council) was dismissed on 19 June 2026 by Inspector G Sibley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be a suitable location for tourist accommodation with regard to local development plan policies.

demolition of existing garage and workshop. Erection of single storey rear extension. Insertion of 1 no. window to the side elevation. Subdivision of existing house in multiple occupation (Use Class C4) to a short term holiday let (Sui Generis) on the first floor and a 1 x 1 bed apartment (Use Class C3) on the ground floor. Erection of single storey building for housekeeping and storage purposes for the short term holiday let and cycle storage for the apartment and housekeeper. Erection of boundary treatments, bicycle parking and alterations to landscaping

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
G Sibley
Postcode
OX3 0NF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be a suitable location for tourist accommodation with regard to local development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of the proposed dwelling and nearby occupiers with regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with Policy V5 of the Oxford Local Plan, which restricts holiday lets to specified arterial roads, and Marsh Lane is not identified as a suitable location for such accommodation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy V5Policy DH1Policy H16Policy RE7Policy RE8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

111 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oxford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed7 October 20266013373
    27 Norham Road, Oxford, OX2 6SQ
  2. Allowed10 June 20266004015
    94 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6JT
  3. Dismissed27 March 20266003546
    Pavement O/S 185-187 Barns Road, Oxford, OX4 3UT
  4. Dismissed26 January 20263374673
    19 Blandford Avenue, Oxford, OX2 8EA
  5. Dismissed19 December 20253372684
    58 Dashwood Road, Oxford, OX4 4SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.