Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 August 20266004296

Spring Park, London Road, Willingham St Mary, NR34 8DD

Planning appeal 6004296 at Spring Park, London Road, Willingham St Mary, NR34 8DD (East Suffolk Council) was dismissed on 7 August 2026 by Inspector T Bennett, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal falls within the scope of an application made under s73 of the Act.

Variation of Condition Nos. 1 and 2 of DC/24/3744/VOC - Variation of Condition 1 of DC/15/1918/VOC - Variation of Condition No. 2 of DC/07/1793/COU - Change of use to static holiday caravan park - Variation to increase number of permitted static caravans from 17 to 22 - To Allow for an Additional Unit on the site to bring the total up to 23 - It is proposed to vary condition 1 to allow for an additional until on the site to bring the total up to 24 without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref DC/25/0398/VOC, dated 15 April 2025

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
caravan-gypsy
Inspector
T Bennett
Postcode
NR34 8DD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal falls within the scope of an application made under s73 of the Act
  • whether the disputed condition is necessary having regard to the policies of the development plan, with particular regard to existing tourism accommodation and the spatial strategy
  • whether the disputed condition is enforceable

What decided it

The removal of the condition would result in the loss of protected tourism accommodation and would permit permanent residential use in an unsustainable location outside the settlement boundary, conflicting with Policies WLP8.17 and WLP1.2 of the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy WLP8.17Policy WLP1.2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed16 April 20263376239
    Moles Meadow, Middleton, IP17 3LU
  2. Dismissed4 August 20253354090
    The Old Vicarage, Low Street, Brandeston, Ipswich, IP147AN
  3. Dismissed10 January 20253330089
    Land to the South of Ipswich Road, Brightwell, Ipswich, IP10 0BJ
  4. Dismissed27 November 20243346950
    Poplar Cottage, Boulge, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP13 6BT
  5. Allowed18 October 20243338348
    Triple Plea Inn, Broadway, Halesworth, IP19 8QW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.