Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 May 20266004482

Land Adjacent Waverlea, Susans Hill, Woodchurch, Ashford, Kent, TN26 3RE

Planning appeal 6004482 at Land Adjacent Waverlea, Susans Hill, Woodchurch, Ashford, Kent, TN26 3RE (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 May 2026 by Inspector Lomax B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national policies.

outline application for 2no bungalow dwellings with associated works with all matters reserved

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lomax B
Postcode
TN26 3RE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The site's inaccessibility to basic day-to-day services by sustainable and active methods of transport, combined with the limited opportunities to utilise non-car modes of travel, constitutes substantial harm that significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits.

The benefits of delivering 2 dwellings (significant weight) and moderate economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm arising from the site's unsustainable location and reliance on private car travel.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HOU5Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP6Policy ENV3a
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266007592
    Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266009946
    Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266012673
    Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266011717
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266011714
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.