Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 July 20266004598

100 Boscombe Grove Road, Bournemouth, BH1 4PG

the erection of single 2 storey dwelling house and outbuilding

Authority
Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
BH1 4PG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed scheme provides sufficient parking for both the proposed and existing plots
  • The effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands SPA, Ramsar Site and Dorset Heaths SAC and the New Forest SAC, New Forest SPA and New Forest RAMSAR
  • Whether the proposal makes suitable provision for BNG

What decided it

The absence of a legal mechanism to secure the required mitigation for likely significant effects on the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands SPA and New Forest SPA, combined with unresolved parking stress and failure to meet the mandatory biodiversity net gain requirement, provided strong reasons to refuse the development that material considerations could not outweigh.

Although the proposal would contribute to housing supply, make effective use of land and reuse brownfield land in a sustainable location with good access to services, these benefits were outweighed by the likely significant adverse effects on the integrity of European habitat sites without adequate mitigation, the unresolved parking stress on a constrained street, and the failure to meet the mandatory biodiversity net gain requirement; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply due to paragraph 195 of the NPPF.

Framework references: 11, 194, 195

Plan policies cited: CS16, CS18, CS33, CS35, CS41, 6.8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.