Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 April 20266004750

16 Wakefield Gardens, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3SJ

Planning appeal 6004750 at 16 Wakefield Gardens, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3SJ (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 17 April 2026 by Inspector Whitfield H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the supply of family-sized housing in the Borough.

the change of use from a single dwelling house into a small HMO for up to six people. Associated cycle and car parking (Retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Whitfield H
Postcode
IG1 3SJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the supply of family-sized housing in the Borough
  • whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for all future occupants with regard to internal space

What decided it

The loss of a family-sized dwelling for which there is significant identified need, combined with the failure to meet minimum bedroom space standards, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits under the Framework's tilted balance.

The benefits of providing a HMO with six occupants and contributing to housing supply were limited because the site was already in residential use and would not add numerically to the housing stock; these limited benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm of losing a family-sized dwelling and failing to provide acceptable living conditions, contrary to Framework expectations for housing needs and amenity standards.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP5Policy LP26Policy LP29Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

421 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.