Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 May 20266004830

8 WINDWARD CLOSE, ENFIELD, LONDON, EN3 6TJ

conversion of a single dwelling house into two self-contained houses (1 × 4-bed, 1 × 3-bed), involving a two-storey side extension, with vehicular access, associated hardstanding for parking, and provision for bicycle and refuse storage

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the width and massing of the development, which would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefit of one additional dwelling when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

The modest benefit of one additional dwelling and efficient use of land was outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11.d) of the Framework.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy CP30, Policy DMD6, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD14, Policy DMD37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.