Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20266004845

Land and Building off Salt Pit Lane, Chorley, L40 2QX

application for Permission in Principle: Demolition of building and the construction of up to two dwellings

Authority
Chorley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
L40 2QX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development with regard to: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt; the effect on the openness of the Green Belt; whether the amount of development would make efficient use of land; and whether any harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The site's location in an unsustainable position, too far from services and facilities to be reasonably accessible other than by car, combined with the harmful effect on Green Belt openness and failure to make efficient use of land, meant that the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate Green Belt development did not exist.

The substantial weight given to harm caused by inappropriateness and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the modest contribution to housing supply, as the proposal would be in an unsustainable location and fail to make efficient use of land, so adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh benefits

Framework references: 11, 110, 115, 129, 143, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy 1, Core Strategy paragraph 10.13, Local Plan Policy BNE5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.