Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision13 May 20266004852

22 Maple Grove, York, YO10 4EH

a single storey rear extension, dormer to rear and canopy to front

Authority
City of York Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Seddon M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the building and street scene

What decided it

The rear dormer and front canopy would harm the character and appearance of the building and street scene in conflict with development plan policies, whereas the single storey rear extension would not.

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.