Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 June 20266004915

The Spice Merchant, Holloway, Malmesbury, SN16 9HX

Planning appeal 6004915 at The Spice Merchant, Holloway, Malmesbury, SN16 9HX (Wiltshire) was dismissed on 11 June 2026 by Inspector R Kent, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan policies concerning new housing with reference to its effect on the character and appearance of its surroundings and the effect on public right of way MALM26.

Change of use of land (Class E) and the erection of one two-storey dwelling house (Class C3)

Authority
Wiltshire
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
R Kent
Postcode
SN16 9HX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan policies concerning new housing with reference to its effect on the character and appearance of its surroundings and the effect on public right of way MALM26
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the Malmesbury Conservation Area and on the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • The effect of the development on the Conygre Local Nature Reserve
  • The effect of the proposed parking and access arrangements on highway safety on the B4040 Holloway Hill
  • Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with regard to noise and odour from the adjoining restaurant
  • Whether the future occupiers of the proposed development would be at risk of flooding

What decided it

The conflict with Framework policies for conserving and enhancing designated heritage assets, combined with harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and setting of listed buildings, provides a strong reason for refusal that engages paragraph 11d)ii of the Framework and disapplies the presumption in favour of sustainable development despite the Council's housing land supply shortfall.

The moderate public benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits and use of previously developed land do not provide clear and convincing justification for the less than substantial harm to the heritage assets and the conflict with the development plan settlement strategy; the heritage harm carries substantial weight against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1Core Policy 2Core Policy 13Core Policy 50Core Policy 51Core Policy 57Core Policy 58Core Policy 60Core Policy 61Core Policy 64Core Policy 67
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 215Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed29 October 20266013838
    Durrington Library, Bulford Road, Durrington, SP4 8EU
  2. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  3. Dismissed13 July 20266002635
    Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF
  4. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  5. Allowed17 June 20266003895
    86-87 Kington St Michael, Kington St Michael, SN14 6HX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.