Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 May 20266005022

Lordship Lane, Outside Nos. 29-35, London, SE22 8EW

the deployment of a Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
London Borough of Southwark
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Marriott H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • For Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and on highway safety
  • For Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on amenity and public safety

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area caused by the Hub's visually dominant presence and introduction of visual clutter outweighed the modest community and economic benefits offered by the proposal.

Framework references: 141, 119, 116

Plan policies cited: Policy D8 of The London Plan (2021), Policy P13 of The Southwark Plan 2019-2036 (2022), Policy T4 of The London Plan, Policy P50 of The Southwark Plan 2019-2036 (2022), Policy P51 of The Southwark Plan 2019-2036 (2022)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.