Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 June 20266005031

29 Pembroke Road, Greenford, Ealing, UB6 9QP

Planning appeal 6005031 at 29 Pembroke Road, Greenford, Ealing, UB6 9QP (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 30 June 2026 by Inspector K Mee, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed rear and side extension on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of outbuildings; replacement side extension; rear dormer extension; conversion to 3no. self-contained dwellings and other associated alterations

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
K Mee
Postcode
UB6 9QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed rear and side extension on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future residents, with regard to the provision of private outdoor amenity space for Flat 2

What decided it

The absence of private outdoor amenity space for Flat 2 resulted in unacceptable living conditions that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply and economic benefits, even under the tilted balance.

The modest contribution to housing supply and economic benefits attracted moderate weight, but the serious adverse impacts of unacceptable living conditions and failure to secure a well-designed place significantly and demonstrably outweighed these benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy 7BPolicy 7.4Policy 7DTable 7D.2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, p37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

236 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.