Planning appeal decision
Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
Planning appeal 6005209 at Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY (Mid Sussex) was dismissed on 9 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the loss of the Cottage, a curtilage listed building, due to its proposed demolition, is justified in terms of its effect on 'Lullings', a Grade II listed building, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.
Demolition of the existing property and replacement with a new single storey residential dwelling. ___________________________________________________________________________________
- Authority
- Mid Sussex
- Appeal type
- other · Planning listed building and conservation area
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- RH17 6QY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the loss of the Cottage, a curtilage listed building, due to its proposed demolition, is justified in terms of its effect on 'Lullings', a Grade II listed building, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
What decided it
The loss of the curtilage listed building would substantially harm the significance of the Grade II listed building Lullings by removing a historic grouping that contributes to its setting, and this harm is not justified by clear and convincing justification or outweighed by public benefits.
the substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building's setting was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of a single dwelling with no net housing gain and modest short-term economic investment
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP34DP35ARD9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy HE4Policy HE6
- Judgments
- Catesby Estates v Steer [2018]; Barnwell Manor Wind Energy Ltd v East Northants DC & Others [2014] EWCA Civ 137
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 202660151205, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005206Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
- Allowed29 September 20266012539Ailsa Craig, Abberton Field, Hurstpierpoint, BN6 9QD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®