Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266005298

Remy Court, 17 South Park Hill Road, Croydon, CR2 7DY

erection of 3 storey building to create 4 self contained dwellings with associated amenity space, landscaping, refuse and cycle storage

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to trees
  • The quality of living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook, light, outdoor space, cycle and bin storage
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to any overbearing effect to 15, 17 and 19 South Park Hill Road, privacy to 28 and 30 Birdhurst Road and the effect on the outdoor space to 17 South Park Hill Road
  • Whether the proposed development would support sustainable transport modes

What decided it

The proposed development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area through its dominant bulk and massing in the back garden setting, and would result in inadequate living conditions for future occupiers due to restricted light and outlook, with these significant harms outweighing the moderate benefits of housing provision.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy DM10, Policy DM28, Policy SP2.8, Policy DM29, Policy DM10.4, Policy SP7.4, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy H2, Policy G5, Policy G7, Policy D6, Policy S4, Policy D7, Policy T4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.