Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 October 20266005320

1 The Orchard, Kings Langley, WD4 8JR

Planning appeal 6005320 at 1 The Orchard, Kings Langley, WD4 8JR (Dacorum) was dismissed on 8 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the provisions of the 1990 Act allow permission to be granted for what is proposed, having regard to the section of the Act under which the application was made.

roof lights, roof, extra storey extension, side extension and porch without complying with a condition attached to planning permission reference: 23/02402/FHA, dated 11 January 2024

Authority
Dacorum
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WD4 8JR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the provisions of the 1990 Act allow permission to be granted for what is proposed, having regard to the section of the Act under which the application was made

What decided it

The proposed amendments related to development (the rear outrigger extension, a window in the original dwelling, and a fence) that was not part of the development permitted by the 23/02402/FHA permission, placing the application outside the scope of section 73 of the 1990 Act.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
John Leslie Finney v Welsh Ministers & Carmarthenshire County Council, Energiekontor (Uk) Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 1868; Fiske v Test Valley BC & Woodington Solar Limited [2022] EWHC 1111 (Admin); Pilkington v SSE & Lancashire CC [1973] 1 WLR 1527; [1973] JPL 711; Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

95 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Invalid20 October 20266011032
    Greymantle, Hempstead Road, Bovingdon, HP3 0HF
  3. Invalid16 October 20266011849
    Greymantle, Hempstead Road, Bovingdon, HP3 0HF
  4. Allowed15 October 20266012966
    126 Bennetts End Road, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8DZ
  5. Allowed14 October 20266006896
    Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.