Planning appeal decision
Whitsbury Stables, Fordingbridge Road, Whitsbury, SP6 3QB
Planning appeal 6005398 at Whitsbury Stables, Fordingbridge Road, Whitsbury, SP6 3QB (New Forest) was allowed on 18 June 2026 by Inspector T Bennett, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the principle of development is acceptable having regard to the local development plan policy on workers dwellings in the countryside, in particular whether the location of the dwellings would be capable of meeting the identified functional need and be well-related to existing farm buildings or other dwellings, and whether the functional need could be fulfilled by another existing dwelling on the unit or other existing accommodation in the area, which is suitable and available for occupation.
demolition of existing dwelling and barn, partial demolition and conversion of existing racing stables and erection of five dwellings with associated infrastructure and landscaping
- Authority
- New Forest
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- T Bennett
- Postcode
- SP6 3QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the principle of development is acceptable having regard to the local development plan policy on workers dwellings in the countryside, in particular whether the location of the dwellings would be capable of meeting the identified functional need and be well-related to existing farm buildings or other dwellings, and whether the functional need could be fulfilled by another existing dwelling on the unit or other existing accommodation in the area, which is suitable and available for occupation
- The effect of the proposal on the Cranborne Chase National Landscape with particular regard to dark skies and landscaping
What decided it
The Council's very significant shortfall in housing land supply (1.53 years) engaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11d) of the Framework, reducing the weight attached to the policy conflict so that the benefits of the scheme outweighed it.
The modest weight given to conflict with Policies DM20 and DM21 was outweighed by the significant weight given to the cumulative benefits of the scheme, so the adverse impacts of granting permission did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM20Policy DM21Policy ENV4Policy STR2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 55
- Judgments
- Morge v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed9 September 20266003718The New Inn, Main Road, Totton, SO40 7EP
- Planning permission granted18 December 20243325725Land Adjacent to Dibden Golf Course/Rectory Cottage, Main Road, Dibden, Southampton, SO45 5TD
- Dismissed18 October 20243343614Lynton, Partridge Road, Brockenhurst, Hampshire, SO42 7RZ
- Dismissed14 October 20243334834Land Adjacent to Sydney Cottage , Winsor Road, Winsor, Hampshire, SO40 2HP
- Notice upheld15 September 20223295779Land at Harwyn, Beaulieu Road, Marchwood, Southampton, SO40 4UQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®